Citadel warning: The war shock is entering the "second stage"; the energy shock is only the beginning, and the downturn in growth is the greater risk.

Citadel warning: The war shock is entering the "second stage"; the energy shock is only the beginning, and the downturn in growth is the greater risk.

```

The market's interpretation of the Middle East conflict is undergoing a shift. As the conflict drags on, the market’s focus has moved from hawkish repricing of inflation and monetary policy to a deeper logic of growth destruction.

In its latest report, Citadel Securities warns that the global supply chain has suffered structural damage that cannot be quickly repaired, and the market is still systemically underestimating the severity of the physical shortages.

Analyst Frank Flight from the institution pointed out that the first stage of the conflict unfolded largely according to the script of hawkish policy shocks—soaring energy prices drove inflation expectations to be repriced, with central banks sending tightening signals. However, using the policy framework of 2022 as a reference may well be a misinterpretation in the current environment. Unlike 2022, the global economy now lacks large-scale fiscal stimulus, buffer effects from a tight labor market, and excess savings, making it overall much more fragile.

Concerns over growth prospects have begun to form a tug-of-war with inflation pressures. Citadel Securities believes that once global short-end interest rates stabilize, forward real rates will become the core of market trading narratives around growth.

Far More Than an Energy Shock: Physical Shortages Are Quietly Spreading

Citadel Securities highlights in its report that the current market pricing of the supply chain shock still relies mainly on crude oil futures, while futures prices are materially underestimating the severity of physical shortages. Take Oman crude as an example: its spot price has already reached $160 per barrel, with a significant premium over futures prices, reflecting acute shortages and high physical premiums in the Asian market.

The institution stresses that this shock should not be simply viewed as an energy price shock, but as a broad supply shock encompassing both price effects and quantity effects. As goods in transit arrive at their destinations and inventories continue to be depleted, the market will increasingly face shrinking physical availability rather than a buffer of inventory. At that point, price discovery mechanisms may decisively shift to pricing by the marginal unit of scarce supply.

Additionally, the range of shortages has far exceeded crude oil itself, covering refined products, liquefied natural gas, helium, fertilizers, and other key industrial inputs. Citadel Securities specifically notes that shortages of helium could pose substantial obstacles for chip manufacturing, and further impact data center construction; the high energy intensity of AI infrastructure means it will also be susceptible to the butterfly effects of global supply chain disruptions.

Converging Outcomes: Both Scenarios Point Toward Demand Contraction and Downgraded Growth

Citadel Securities describes two scenarios, but believes that both ultimately lead to demand contraction and a downgrade in growth prospects.

In the first scenario, the supply shock itself will directly erode demand, given the absence of excess demand support; in the second scenario, if growth proves more resilient, central banks will proactively tighten to offset inflationary pressures.

The institution notes that the transmission mechanism of tightening financial conditions is vital—when driven by policy, the process is usually painful but manageable because central banks retain the ability to reverse course; but when driven by the market, a deterioration in growth expectations leads to widening credit spreads, compressed equity valuations, and a stronger dollar, forming a self-reinforcing tightening cycle.

This dynamic is particularly pronounced in emerging markets, especially energy importers. Worsening terms of trade will depress local currency exchange rates, forcing central banks to tighten defensively to protect their currency. Weakening emerging market assets feed back into global growth and amplify tightening effects globally.

The Value of Dollar Call Options Stands Out; Doubts Over AI Capex

On the FX strategy front, Citadel Securities believes that, given the relatively modest rise of the dollar so far and low FX implied volatility compared to other assets, dollar call options provide attractive asymmetric protection against renewed escalation of the conflict.

The institution also raises caution about the sustainability of AI capital expenditure. The report points out that if global financial conditions tighten in a disorderly manner, with growth expectations and risk appetite falling in tandem, there are real doubts whether AI capex can maintain its current growth pace. This risk diminishes somewhat in the short-term escalation scenario, but considering the more fragile fundamentals of the global economy after this shock, the risk cannot be dismissed.

Citadel Securities concludes that the next phase of market movement will depend more on the extent of growth shocks than escalation dynamics themselves. The level and pace of financial condition tightening will be the key metrics for judging spillover effects.

Risk Disclosure and DisclaimerThe market involves risk, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account individual users’ unique investment objectives, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their specific circumstances. Investments made based on this article are the sole responsibility of the user. ```