From Venezuela to Iran, why has the expectation of regime change turned into a bearish factor for oil prices?

```

Geopolitical turmoil was once the most reliable catalyst for surging oil prices, but this old logic is being completely rewritten by new market realities. With the U.S. shale oil revolution radically reshaping the global energy supply landscape, alongside the normalization of sanctioned oil "shadow markets," the traditional logic of geopolitical risk premiums has fundamentally reversed.

According to Xinhua News Agency and CCTV News, at noon local time on January 3 (early morning January 4 Beijing time), U.S. President Trump and Secretary of Defense Hegseth held a press conference at Mar-a-Lago in Florida regarding U.S. military action against Venezuela, controlling and deporting Venezuelan President Maduro. According to Global Times quoting Iranian media on the 1st, riots erupted in two Iranian provinces, resulting in at least 3 deaths and 13 injuries.

According to a January 5 article by The Wall Street Journal’s Spencer Jakab, in the past, similar events—such as the failed coup against former Venezuelan President Chavez twenty-three years ago or the 1979 Iranian Islamic Revolution—led to oil prices soaring nearly 40% and 150% within months, respectively.

However, in the face of the current situation, the crude oil market has reacted coolly. Crude oil prices have just experienced an unprecedented three-year decline, and as OPEC gradually withdraws from voluntary production cuts, the market remains in a severe state of oversupply. Venezuela’s oil output now accounts for less than 1% of the global total, about 900,000 barrels per day—far from its former market share of over 3%. Although Venezuela and Iran are founding OPEC members, their influence on the market has been greatly diminished.

More importantly, changes in market structure mean that “regime change” no longer simply equates to supply disruption. On the contrary, investors now expect that if sanctions are eased and trade returns to normal, market supply could even increase. For energy investors, this new normal may mean the current downturn cycle will only worsen.

Fundamental Shift in Supply Structure and the "Shadow Market"

Jakab argues that the current oil market has actually split into two parallel worlds: one is a transparent public market, the other is a “don’t ask, don’t tell” market comprised of sanctioned countries like Iran and Venezuela. Oil from these sanctioned countries flows at discounted prices to Turkey and India through complex routes and shadow tanker networks.

The existence of such a structure cushions geopolitical shocks. Although the authorities in Venezuela and Iran are still struggling to maintain control, unless the situation devolves into extreme violent conflict, regime change could actually prompt a normalization of crude oil trade—putting downward pressure on oil prices.

U.S. refinery stocks and oilfield service shares rose in early Monday trading, which confirms this logic. The U.S. refining system is primarily designed to process the heavy crude oil produced in Venezuela, not the light shale oil from domestic U.S. sources. Currently, millions of barrels of oil must be transported long distances, pushing up the production costs of diesel and gasoline. If sanctions are lifted, trade routes will become more rationalized, which is favorable for refiners. However, for pure crude oil producers, the expectation of increased supply makes it difficult to support share price increases.

Obstacles to Restoring Production and Practical Challenges

Jakab notes that the flip side of regime change expectations is the possibility of sanctions being lifted, which would reshape the flow of global oil trade. Currently, the U.S. is both a major crude oil exporter and importer—a unique status stemming from its refineries being designed to process heavy crude like that from Venezuela, not the light crude from U.S. shale.

If changes in Venezuela lead to eased sanctions, American refiners could obtain the heavy crude they need more easily, thus reducing costs.

At present, millions of barrels of crude oil worldwide have to be transported long distances, either to circumvent sanctions or to find suitable refineries, which increases the cost of turning crude into diesel and gasoline. If trade returns to rationality, this inefficient logistical cost will be eliminated. That is why the market pushed up refinery stocks after the incident. However, for pure oil producers, smoother trade means fiercer competition, which is not a positive sign.

Shale Oil Revolution: Enhanced Geopolitical Immunity

Jakab writes that since 1979 and 2003, the biggest transformation in the oil market has occurred in the U.S. The prosperity brought by fracking has made the U.S. the world’s largest oil producer, and fundamentally changed the mechanism for how supply reacts to price. Unlike in past crises, producers can now adjust output much more quickly in response to price fluctuations.

Jakab notes that this flexibility has changed considerations in Washington. Whether it’s military action to arrest Maduro or last June’s bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, such geopolitical events have only a minimal impact on U.S. gas prices and are even more negligible when it comes to the overall U.S. economy.

However, Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, points out that even with the confidence of the U.S. government, restoring production in Venezuela faces huge challenges. High costs, unresolved legal disputes, and local security situations all make repairing abandoned oil wells in this unstable country a poor risk-reward proposition. This again confirms that today’s oil industry is no longer a market easily swayed by single geopolitical events like in the past.

Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market has risks; investing requires caution. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and does not take into account the special investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual users. Users should consider whether any opinions, points of view, or conclusions in this article suit their particular situation. Investment is at your own risk. ```