Jensen Huang: No new legislation is needed for AI security; market forces are sufficient.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang stated that ensuring the safety of artificial intelligence does not require the formulation of new laws and regulations, as market mechanisms can already play a sufficient role in restraining it.

Jensen Huang made the above remarks at the Salesforce Dreamforce conference in San Francisco on September 15. In a conversation with Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, he emphasized that companies should control their own product launch schedules to ensure that the products they release gain market acceptance.

Jensen Huang's statement directly addresses the widespread controversy surrounding AI governance. At a time when regulators and legislators are debating how to regulate AI, this voice from the head of the world's largest AI chip supplier carries significant industry-leading significance.

Innovation and safety are not mutually exclusive; market forces are replacing regulation.

Jensen Huang explicitly opposes the view that pits the speed of AI innovation against product safety, calling it a "false dichotomy." He stated:

It is absolutely possible to have both.

He believes that companies can fully consider security while advancing AI development. The key is to control the release schedule and have a full grasp of the market acceptance of the product.

Regarding governance, Huang Renxun prefers to rely on market mechanisms rather than government intervention. He stated that "market forces already exist" and are sufficient to effectively constrain the security of AI products.

This stance differs significantly from the positions of some policymakers. Currently, the debate over whether AI needs specific legislation is intensifying in several major economies, and Huang's remarks will undoubtedly add a new dimension to this debate.

The legislative direction at the federal level prioritizes extreme risks and national security.

The U.S. Congress currently lacks a unified federal law similar to the EU's AI Act, and instead focuses on targeted proposals that address extreme risks and national security.

Lawmakers from both parties recently introduced the "AI Kill Switch Act," which mandates that developers of the most advanced AI systems retain the ability to limit, suspend, or completely shut down the systems; if a system shows signs of being out of control that could lead to catastrophic harm, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would have the authority to issue a shutdown order directly.

Meanwhile, a group of lawmakers, led by U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders, are pushing for legislation that calls for a halt to the development and deployment of “super artificial intelligence” (ASI) until federal security review rules are finalized.

In the area of national security , the Advanced AI Security Readiness Act is currently under review in the U.S. Congress, requiring the National Security Agency (NSA) to develop a defense plan to prevent foreign powers from stealing core AI technologies. The U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee has also included a clause in the annual National Defense Authorization Act stipulating that the military must incorporate human oversight when using AI weapons, strictly prohibiting completely autonomous decision-making.

At the executive level , the White House signed the Executive Order on Promoting Innovation and Security in Advanced Artificial Intelligence in June 2026 and established the AI Cybersecurity Rectification Institute to fix vulnerabilities in cutting-edge models.

Risk warning and disclaimerInvesting involves risk; please exercise caution. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual users. Users should consider whether any opinions, views, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their specific circumstances. Any investment decisions made based on this information are at your own risk.