Musk Profits Greatly from War: Starlink Wartime Fees Soar 5-Fold, Forcing the Pentagon to Foot the Bill

```

During the US-Iran war, SpaceX took advantage of Starlink’s irreplaceability to significantly raise prices for the Pentagon, increasing the satellite connection fee for kamikaze drones from about $5,000 per month to $25,000, a nearly fivefold increase. The Pentagon ultimately chose to compromise, but this dispute is exposing the US military system’s deep dependence on a single commercial supplier.

According to Reuters, after the US launched airstrikes against Iran on February 28, SpaceX executives immediately began negotiations with Pentagon officials, arguing that the military had long used higher-level services at a lower price. The Pentagon ultimately agreed to the price increase, causing the per-unit cost of each LUCAS drone to almost double, rising from about $30,000 to nearly $60,000. At the same time, SpaceX also quoted a sky-high price for providing direct-to-cell service to Iranian civilians: a $500 million startup fee plus $100 million monthly operating fee, shocking defense officials.

Underlying this pricing dispute is SpaceX’s upcoming IPO, which could become one of the largest in history. As the Pentagon’s reliance on Starlink deepens, Musk’s bargaining power in US national security is growing in tandem.

Battlefield Demand Fuels Pricing Confidence

LUCAS is a low-cost kamikaze drone, functionally similar to Iran’s Shahed drone, capable of loitering over target areas and then diving and detonating.

According to Pentagon documents obtained by Reuters and two informed sources, SpaceX believes that the use conditions of the LUCAS drone are more comparable to its aviation-grade subscription services, rather than the lower-priced terrestrial or mobility services, and therefore should be charged $25,000 per month rather than the previous $5,000.

The Pentagon countered that the $25,000 monthly fee was intended for aircraft, while the LUCAS drone uses the Starlink connection for only a few minutes to a few hours, making the pricing standard inapplicable.

However, under mounting pressure to intensify strikes against Iran, the Pentagon ultimately accepted SpaceX’s price hike.

According to Reuters, senior officials, including Under Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg, still felt uneasy about this arrangement. During the April ceasefire, Pentagon officials renegotiated pricing with SpaceX's head of defense business, retired four-star Air Force General Terrence O’Shaughnessy, but the controversy did not subside.

Musk’s Public Statement Heightens Tension

At the beginning of the war, one post by Musk himself further escalated the conflict.

On March 1, in response to a user posting a picture of the LUCAS drone on X, he wrote: "Using terminals for weapons systems is a violation of the commercial Starlink terms of service, applies to all users, and will be shut down if discovered." He emphasized that the independent network for exclusive US government use is called "Starshield."

The Pentagon subsequently denied any breach of contract. But the public statement itself clearly revealed the blurred boundaries between commercial Starlink and military Starshield, as well as SpaceX’s initiative in defining service terms.

“Forcing the government into a corner”

Analysts point out that the fundamental difference between SpaceX and traditional defense contractors is its vast commercial market, making it not entirely dependent on government contracts. Clayton Swope, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, stated SpaceX "really forced the US government into a corner."

According to SEC filings, US government revenue accounts for only about 20% of SpaceX’s total revenue. This means SpaceX has far more leverage in negotiations than traditional military manufacturers. In contrast, the Pentagon has almost no alternatives—SpaceX’s roughly 10,000 satellites account for more than 60% of the world’s on-orbit satellites, while competitors like OneWeb and Amazon’s Kuiper constellations are far smaller.

In a statement, the Pentagon said its commercial satcom procurement office is seeking other competitive suppliers, but no company can currently provide a Starlink-equivalent alternative.

Risk Warnings from Past Reliance

The importance of Starlink for military operations became clear during the Ukraine war, but its potential risks were also revealed. According to previous reports by Reuters, in 2022 Musk ordered Starlink service shut off in parts of Ukraine just as Ukrainian forces were advancing on Russian positions, hampering key counteroffensive operations. Later, US Navy unmanned vessels lost connection during a global Starlink outage and drifted at sea, forcing testing missions to be aborted.

In this Iran war, Starshield terminals have been deployed in over a dozen drone systems, covering platforms from aerial attack drones to unmanned surface vessels, with the battlefield penetration of Starlink surpassing that seen during the Ukraine conflict.

Iran Civilian Access Plan: Sky-high Prices Raise Alarms

Aside from the drone pricing dispute, another front is also simmering. After suppressing protests, Iranian authorities imposed an internet blockade and deployed jamming devices in major cities, confiscating over 6,000 Starlink terminals previously smuggled in by the Trump administration.

According to Reuters, the Pentagon then entered into negotiations with SpaceX to deploy direct-to-cell service, similar to 5G connectivity, allowing users to access the network without ground terminals and bypass Iranian jamming. However, SpaceX’s quoted price shocked defense officials: a $500 million startup fee plus $100 million per month in operating costs.

SpaceX’s 2025 projected Starlink business revenue is $11.4 billion. Reuters reports it is unclear whether an agreement has been reached. The Pentagon declined to comment on the report.

On the Eve of the IPO, Commercial Logic Drives Negotiations

The timing of this pricing dispute is subtle. SpaceX plans to launch its IPO next month, potentially making it one of the largest in history. Against this backdrop, boosting government contract revenue and optimizing income structure carry clear commercial motives.

According to Pentagon documents, the Pentagon is currently considering purchasing more than 3,500 Starshield terminal subscriptions, including 100 at the higher-priced aviation service level. Reuters estimates the contract could bring SpaceX hundreds of millions of dollars in annual revenue, but the specific amount and whether the agreement has been finalized remain unclear.

Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks; investments should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and does not take into consideration the special investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual users. Users should consider whether any opinions, perspectives, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their specific situation. Investing accordingly is at your own risk. ```