Musk publicly debunks rumors: Reports of SpaceX lowering IPO valuation target are "false"
```
The valuation differences surrounding SpaceX’s potential IPO are becoming a focal point of market attention.
According to earlier Bloomberg reports, the company has lowered its target valuation from over $2 trillion to at least $1.8 trillion, but Musk publicly denied this claim on the X platform, calling it "false".
Previous reports cited informed sources, stating SpaceX plans to start its roadshow as early as June 4th and complete pricing on June 11th, though the timeline remains uncertain. The valuation adjustment is a prudent revision after discussions with the company's advisory team and investors, and the valuation may still be raised again during the roadshow based on market feedback. Even with valuation disputes, the IPO aims to raise up to $75 billion; if successful, it will break the global IPO fundraising record.
SpaceX plans to list on the Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas Exchange under the ticker symbol "SPCX". Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Citigroup, and JPMorgan are serving as lead underwriters, with 18 other banks participating. For such a large offering, investor feedback, market conditions, and pricing discipline will all jointly influence the final outcome.
According to a previous article from Wallstreetcn, current market enthusiasm has spilled over into the crypto trading sector. After perpetual futures contracts tracking SpaceX’s pre-IPO went online, daily trading averaged nearly $18 million over the past two weeks, indicating investors are trying to price it before its official listing. Musk’s public denial has intensified the market’s focus on the final pricing. The key is not just the valuation figures, but whether the market can accommodate such a large-scale offering.

Risk warning and disclaimerThe market contains risks; investment requires caution. This article does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account the specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs of individual users. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular situation. Investing based on this information is at your own risk. ```