"Perpetual contracts" allow 24/7 leveraged trading; crypto capital aggressively speculates on gold and oil "tokens."

Crypto hedge funds are turning their attention to traditional commodities such as gold, crude oil, and copper, harnessing perpetual contracts on blockchain platforms to trade around the clock. This allows them to price ahead of traditional markets before they open and profit from arbitrage across platform price differences.

According to Bloomberg on Wednesday, as the excess returns of crypto strategies have been squeezed by institutional competition, these fund managers are applying the same tools and logic to traditional assets—where pricing efficiency is lower and competitors are few. Blockchain platforms like Hyperliquid, Ostium, Lighter have become the core venues for this transition. Contracts are settled in USD stablecoins, operate 24/7, and do not rely on traditional clearinghouses.

Geopolitical tensions have further accelerated this trend: as the recent escalation between the US, Israel, and Iran unfolded, crude oil contracts on Hyperliquid saw a significant surge in weekend trading volume, reflecting market risk pricing over the expanding conflict several hours ahead of traditional markets.

The market impact of this shift has already begun to emerge. According to Coinmetrics, in March this year, traditional asset contracts accounted for about 30% of Hyperliquid's total trading volume; on the Ostium platform, this share has consistently exceeded 90% over the past half-year. The market capitalization of tokenized Real World Assets (RWA) has grown by about 360% since 2025, reaching $26.5 billion.

Crypto Arbitrage Shrinks, Funds Shift to Traditional Assets

The migration of crypto hedge funds to traditional assets is rooted in the sharp decline in returns from previous strategies.

Alpha EV Fund founder Taylor Godwin entered the market in 2022, when the crypto market was still filled with easily replicable arbitrage opportunities. One of the most stable was basis trading—simultaneously buying spot Bitcoin and selling futures contracts at higher prices, earning the spread as the two prices converge. This spread once provided double-digit annual returns, but has now narrowed to 5%–6%. Stablecoin lending rates have similarly dropped from highs of 30% to low single digits.

Godwin subsequently sought new opportunities on the same platforms. Earlier this year, Alpha EV executed a paired trade on Hyperliquid: shorting silver and going long copper. Silver prices had risen to around $114, with long positioning rates soaring over 250% annually, showing the trade was overcrowded; copper was about $5.80 per pound, had not matched the same surge, and had lower entry costs. The position was held for about a week, with most returns coming from short silver funding rate income, yielding 20%–30% annualized.

"In the past two months, we've allocated less than 5% of our total capital to these trades," said Godwin. "As the opportunity set expands, that may rise to 10%–20%."

Cross-Platform Arbitrage: Pricing Chaos Is Opportunity in New Markets

For fund managers with quantitative backgrounds, trading traditional assets on blockchain platforms offers a familiar logic: new markets display chaotic pricing, wide spreads across platforms, and correlations between linked assets frequently break down when one side trades 24/7 while the other is limited by trading hours.

M-Squared multi-manager fund's Kacper Szafran calls these strategies "Real World Asset Arbitrage"—exploiting the pricing differences between blockchain platforms and traditional markets, or among correlated assets temporarily detached from usual relationships. He states these trades currently deliver about 1%–3% monthly returns, while traditional crypto token strategies only contribute about 0.5%.

"Market-neutral strategies in crypto assets remain under pressure—funding rates and basis returns are now close to risk-free rates," Szafran said. "So what we’re focusing on is essentially a new form of market-neutral strategy built around real-world asset arbitrage."

Nikita Fadeev, managing partner at crypto hedge fund Fasanara Digital, is focused on arbitraging between tokenized gold products and gold-pegged perpetual contracts, capturing spreads between platforms like Binance and OKX. He points out the biggest constraint is that cross-platform arbitrage is still incomplete—it's difficult to execute cross-leg trades between crypto platforms and traditional markets such as CME, "We have one leg of the trade, but the other is still missing."

Retail Funds Follow, but Risks Remain Significant

The influx of institutional funds is attracting retail traders to follow suit. These retail players are also shifting from crypto tokens to commodities and macro trades, providing deeper liquidity for platforms—yet this also means that inefficient pricing will eventually be arbitraged away.

The risks in this space are equally important. These platforms are not regulated by traditional commodity exchanges; liquidity may be growing, but is still much lower than traditional markets. If leveraged strategies encounter discrepancies between price oracles and actual market prices, forced liquidation may occur.

Gyld Finance co-founder Ruchir Gupta points out that even with oracles bringing real prices onto the chain, traders still face gap risk when underlying assets are repriced. He adds that tokenization itself lacks standardization and protections—if a hack occurs, tokens may be arbitrarily minted, leading to price collapse and triggering chain liquidations for leveraged traders.

Yet for fund managers already engaged, these frictions are precisely where the opportunities lie. In mature markets, inefficiencies are quickly arbitraged away; in emerging markets, they persist—at least for a while. The irony is obvious: these funds were originally created to trade digital assets, but now, on the same blockchain infrastructure, the most profitable trades are in the world's most traditional asset classes.

Risk DisclaimerMarkets are risky and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account the specific investment objectives, financial circumstances, or needs of individual users. Users should consider whether any opinions, views or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular situation. Any investment based on this article is at your own risk.