The United States has reached trade agreements with multiple Southeast Asian countries, but "insufficient details and subsequent negotiations will determine whether key industries such as apparel and electronics can receive exemptions."
During Trump's trip to Asia, the United States finalized new trade arrangements with four Southeast Asian countries: Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam. However, because the agreements lack binding details—especially regarding which products will receive tariff exemptions—their ultimate impact remains highly uncertain.
According to CCTV News, U.S. President Trump departed for Southeast Asia on October 25 local time, embarking on a week-long visit to three Asian countries: Malaysia, Japan, and South Korea.
According to the Trump administration, President Trump reached formal trade agreements with Malaysia and Cambodia during his trip to Asia, and signed framework agreements with Thailand and Vietnam.
Under these agreements, the Southeast Asian countries will lower tariffs and regulatory barriers on U.S. products such as automobiles and agricultural goods, commit to increased purchases of U.S. goods, and make concessions in key mineral and technology regulation sectors. Malaysia also pledged to invest $70 billion in the U.S. over the next decade.
In return, the U.S. will exempt certain products from these countries from tariffs, although the overall tariff rate will remain at 19% to 20%.
However, for global enterprises relying on production and sourcing from these countries, the lack of detailed provisions in the agreements is a primary concern. Analysts point out that although countries agreed in principle to reduce tariffs, subsequent negotiations will determine whether key export industries—such as apparel, footwear, and electronics—will receive U.S. tariff reductions.
The U.S. Reaches Agreements With Four Southeast Asian Countries
Under the agreements with Malaysia and Cambodia, both countries agreed to cut tariffs on various categories of U.S. exports, including agricultural products, metals, and manufactured goods. They also agreed to accept many U.S. regulatory and certification standards in the automobile and agricultural sectors, removing non-tariff barriers for U.S. products entering their markets.
The agreements also include several major promises. Both countries agreed to purchase new Boeing aircraft, and Malaysia pledged to invest $70 billion in the U.S. over the next ten years. In addition, both countries committed to facilitating U.S. access to key minerals, refraining from imposing regulations or fines on American tech firms, and agreed to prevent companies from other countries from exporting goods to the U.S. at below-market prices.
The agreements signed by the U.S. with Thailand and Vietnam are preliminary frameworks, regarded as the foundation for reaching broader trade deals in the future. Both countries agreed to cut tariffs on nearly all U.S. goods, reduce regulatory restrictions on American firms, and accept U.S. standards for products such as automobiles.
Ensuring the supply of key minerals is another major focus. The U.S. signed critical mineral agreements with both Thailand and Malaysia. These agreements are intended to give U.S. companies priority access to resources such as rare earth elements.
Broad Agreement Scope But Lacking Substantive Details
According to the frameworks, the U.S. will retain "reciprocal tariffs" of between 19% and 20% on imports from these four countries, but has promised partial exemptions for products from the signatory countries. The scope of these exemptions will be the core topic of follow-up negotiations.
In a text message, Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sun Chanthol stated that Cambodia is "satisfied" with the agreement but hopes the U.S. will lower tariff rates on apparel, footwear, and tourism goods—which account for more than half of the country's exports. Similarly, Thailand and Vietnam will have to wait for the U.S. to clarify its specific tariff exemption list in the future.
Still, Bloomberg Economics' geoeconomic analyst Adam Farrar commented, "Without concrete commitments, the impact of this agreement may not surpass that of the summit itself."
Analysis suggests the announced agreements have limited legal binding force. Peter Mumford, Southeast Asia analyst at risk consultancy Eurasia Group, noted, "None of these are legally binding agreements—they're quite flexible." He added, "This (agreement) is a step in the right direction, but there is still considerable uncertainty," referring to unresolved issues on rules of origin, sector tariffs, and transshipment taxes.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market involves risks, and investments should be made cautiously. This article does not constitute individual investment advice and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual users. Users should consider whether any opinions, views, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investment made accordingly is at one's own risk.