Three Fed officials voted against at the April meeting: It is not appropriate to signal a rate cut as the next step.

```

On Friday local time, several officials who voted in opposition during this week's Federal Reserve statement said they believe it is not appropriate to signal that rate cuts may be coming next.

Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan, and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack each issued statements explaining their reasons for voting, and all three had no objections to keeping rates unchanged, but disagreed with the wording of the statement. Their logic for dissent was similar.

Kashkari stated that the statement includes "a kind of forward guidance on the possible direction of monetary policy." He believes that, given recent developments in the economy, geopolitics, and the highly uncertain outlook, it is not appropriate to provide such forward guidance at this time. He advocated that the FOMC statement on Wednesday should have indicated that the next move could either be a rate cut or a rate hike.

Hammack also said she does not support signaling "a bias toward future monetary policy easing" in the statement. "Given the current economic outlook, I believe such a clear bias toward easing is no longer appropriate." She pointed out that with the Iran war and the resulting surge in oil prices threatening the Fed's 2% inflation target, inflationary pressures remain broad-based.

Logan also said she is increasingly concerned about whether inflation can return to target levels. She stated: "The Middle East conflict has introduced the possibility of supply disruptions becoming prolonged or recurring, which could create further inflationary pressures. At the same time, the labor market remains stable, unemployment is low, and nonfarm employment growth is keeping pace with labor force growth. However, the economic outlook remains highly uncertain."

Additionally, Logan mentioned that the forward guidance portion in the FOMC statement is an important policy tool that households and businesses rely on for future planning.

The April 2026 meeting was the third consecutive meeting in which the FOMC held rates steady after three rate cuts in the second half of 2025. The statement passed with 8 votes in favor and 4 against, the highest number of opposing votes since 1992. Governor Stephen Millan again voted in opposition, supporting a rate cut.

The specific wording at the center of this controversy was: "In considering the extent and timing of any additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks."

The phrase "additional adjustments" is at the heart of the debate. Fed watchers generally believe this wording signals that the next move will likely continue the recent direction of rate cuts.

Data released on Thursday showed US inflation rebounded in March. According to the US Department of Commerce, core inflation excluding food and energy rose to 3.2%, the highest since November 2023.

Risk warning and disclaimerThe market involves risks and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account individual users’ specific investment objectives, financial circumstances, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, views, or conclusions in this article are appropriate for their particular situation. Investments made based on this article are at the user's own risk. ```