U.S. SEC introduces major new policy! Limits set on class-action lawsuits, aimed at "making U.S. IPOs great again"

```

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has introduced a major policy change, allowing listed companies to prohibit shareholders from initiating class action lawsuits, providing companies with a powerful new tool to restrict shareholder litigation.

On Wednesday, the SEC overturned a decades-old policy, introducing a new rule that allows listed companies to require shareholder disputes to be resolved through arbitration, thereby moving disputes out of the court system’s spotlight.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins pledged to "Make IPOs Great Again," stating that the regulator will no longer block IPOs on the grounds that companies prohibit shareholder class actions, emphasizing that this move aims to reduce companies' compliance burdens.

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce also voiced support, believing that "the market will do a better job than we will in assessing (mandatory arbitration) applications."

However, this policy shift immediately triggered concerns in the market about investor protection. Democratic lawmakers and investor rights advocacy groups warned that this move would unduly weaken shareholder rights and potentially harm the core advantages that have long attracted global investors to U.S. capital markets.

Regulatory Easing to Promote IPO Revival

The core motivation behind this policy adjustment is to enhance the attractiveness of U.S. capital markets by loosening regulations.

Paul Atkins stated explicitly:

The SEC's goal is to minimize regulatory uncertainty and simplify the legal complexity of the entire SEC rulebook by eliminating compliance requirements that do not provide meaningful investor protection, thereby making public listing a more attractive option for more companies.

Atkins further revealed:

The SEC’s next steps will include providing more support for newly listed or smaller companies, and expanding the ability of already-listed companies to easily access public markets to raise additional capital.

He added that the agency will be preparing concrete proposals on these issues. This series of measures reflects a more pro-business stance taken by regulators appointed during the Trump administration, gradually rolling back the strict regulatory and enforcement agenda adopted during President Biden's term.

Reactions and Market Impact

Although regulators intend to boost market vitality, the approach of weakening shareholders' litigation rights has sounded alarms.

Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Jack Reed warned in a letter to the SEC that allowing companies to bypass class actions “would be a grave mistake and put investors and markets at risk.”

Shareholder rights advocates believe this change will reduce market transparency and tilt the balance of power toward companies.

They fear it may erode the institutional advantages that have historically attracted investors to the world's largest capital market.

For investors, class actions have long been seen as an effective tool for recovering losses when companies behave improperly.

However, the policy change will not immediately open the floodgates to mandatory arbitration.

Delaware, where most U.S. listed companies are registered, explicitly prohibits the use of arbitration in federal securities claims.

Yet, this state law restriction is not unbreakable.

In recent years, Delaware has faced fierce competition from Texas, Nevada, and other states in attracting corporate registrations.

If other states adopt a more lenient stance on mandatory arbitration clauses, some companies may be attracted to re-register outside of Delaware, giving the SEC’s new policy more room for implementation in practice.

High Settlement Amounts in Litigation, Arbitration Motives Under Scrutiny

The financial impact of class actions is one of the focal points of this policy debate.

According to statistics from Stanford Law School and Cornerstone Research, the total settlement amount for securities class actions involving U.S. listed companies reached $3.7 billion in 2024.

Over the past decade, the annual number of settlements ranged from 72 to 105, with total shareholder compensation fluctuating between $1.9 billion and $7.4 billion.

On this point, SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw, a Democratic appointee and critic of the new policy, noted that the amount returned to harmed investors from class actions is far higher than what the SEC’s own enforcement actions recover.

Last year, the SEC’s enforcement actions recovered only $345 million for harmed investors.

How the new policy will affect this landscape, and whether companies will widely adopt mandatory arbitration clauses, remain to be tested by the market.

Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market has risks, and investment should be made with caution. This article does not constitute individual investment advice nor does it take into account the individual investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of any user. Users should consider whether any opinions, views, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their specific situation. Investment based on this article is at your own risk. ```