U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent: I will go to the Supreme Court to emphasize the importance of tariffs.

```

The Trump administration is mounting a key defense of its signature tariff policy, as a decisive hearing at the U.S. Supreme Court approaches, with Treasury Secretary Bassent announcing he will attend in person.

On Tuesday, November 4, Bassent publicly stated that he will go to the Supreme Court to "emphasize the importance of tariffs". This Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hold oral arguments on whether President Trump has the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs.

A few days earlier, Bassent expressed his "optimism" about the Supreme Court’s decision in an interview. When asked how he would respond if the court issued an unfavorable ruling, he said, "We’ll figure something out when the time comes."

This stance echoes that of Trump. Wallstreetcn noted that Trump had previously considered attending the hearing in person, calling it "one of the most important cases ever," but later said he would not be present.

On November 2, Trump flew from Mar-a-Lago, Florida, back to Washington, and told reporters on Air Force One: "I don’t want everyone focusing on me. This is not about me personally, but about our country."

Trump’s Tariff Policy Faces Pivotal Court Showdown

This Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will jointly review the cases of Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections. The core legal issue in both lawsuits is whether the president has the authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose broad tariff measures, and whether this violates the constitutional principle of separation of powers.

Learning Resources is an educational toy manufacturer, and VOS Selections is a family-run importer and distributor of wines and spirits.

Previously, a federal appeals court ruled that Trump’s implementation of several reciprocal tariff measures exceeded the emergency powers of the presidency, and the Supreme Court’s current review is an appeal of that lower court decision. The case is widely seen as the ultimate verdict on the "cornerstone" of Trump’s economic agenda. Trump has warned that if the government loses the case, the U.S. "will be weakened and mired in financial chaos for many years to come."

If the Supreme Court rules against the government, it could result in halving the current average effective tariff rate in the U.S., force the government to refund tens of billions of dollars in collected duties, and even shake some of the trade agreements already reached.

Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investments must be made cautiously. This article does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account the special investment objectives, financial status or needs of individual users. Users should consider whether any opinions, views or conclusions in this article suit their specific situation. Investments made accordingly are at your own risk. ```