Wall Street bold prediction: To hedge labor shortages, Walsh may tolerate 2.5%-3.5% inflation!

The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy framework may be undergoing a major shift. BCA Research analyst Dhaval Joshi predicts that under future Fed Chair Walsh, the Fed may in effect tolerate inflation rising to the 2.5%-3.5% range to support the U.S. economy running at a higher temperature. The core motivation behind this strategy is that the U.S. labor market is at a rare equilibrium point between supply and demand, where any contraction on either side could trigger a recession.

Data shows that currently, both labor demand and supply in the U.S. amount to 172 million people, and both job vacancies and non-temporary unemployment numbers are stable at 6.6 million, putting the market in a theoretical “perfect balance.” Joshi points out that at this critical juncture, if tighter immigration enforcement causes a contraction in labor supply, it will directly threaten economic expansion. Therefore, the Fed may increase its tolerance for inflation, stimulating aggregate demand while boosting labor force participation in an “overheated” environment to offset supply-side contraction.

This policy shift would deeply reshape asset pricing logic. The report expects that even if the inflation center rises to 2.5%-3.5%, the Fed will continue cutting rates, accelerating the decline in short-term real interest rates. The dollar will continue to weaken as real rate differentials narrow, and the U.S. Treasury yield curve will face “bear steepening” pressure—i.e., rising long-term yields causing long-term Treasuries to underperform cash and other sovereign bonds.

Against this macro background, equities are expected to continue outperforming bonds. BCA Research recommends tactical overweighting of the MSCI Global Consumer Discretionary sector relative to Industrials. Over the past 65 trading days, this sector has significantly underperformed by nearly 20%, creating substantial room for recovery.

Labor Market Equilibrium Brings “Dual Risks”

The U.S. labor market is entering a rare “moment of balance,” marking the first time since the pandemic that supply and demand have reached a numerical equilibrium.

By definition, labor supply includes employed and unemployed people; labor demand includes employed people, job vacancies, and temporarily unemployed workers. When the number of “jobs seeking workers” equals “workers seeking jobs,” the market is in a strictly balanced state.

This equilibrium is rare, as it marks a fundamental shift in economic logic. For decades before the pandemic, the U.S. economy was in chronic demand deficit, with labor demand consistently below supply. But post-pandemic, the supply-demand relationship reversed, labor supply became a bottleneck to growth, and the economy entered a “supply-constrained” operating mode. In this mode, a slowdown in demand does not directly result in GDP contraction, which explains why in 2023-2024, the U.S. economy maintained positive growth despite weak demand.

However, the current equilibrium also means the market has entered a “dual-risk” zone: contractions in either demand or supply will directly lead to output decline. Hence, policy must promote simultaneous expansion on both sides. This means the Fed needs to keep the economy running at a “high temperature”: stimulating aggregate demand with easy policy, and expanding supply by increasing labor force participation to offset potential labor outflows from tougher immigration enforcement.

Structural Rise in Wage Inflation Hard to Reverse

Although the U.S. labor market has returned to pre-pandemic equilibrium, wage inflation remains significantly above pre-pandemic levels. In the fourth quarter of last year, the U.S. Employment Cost Index (ECI) rose 3.4% year-over-year, exceeding the 3% threshold corresponding to the 2% core PCE inflation target.

This divergence is not just a short-term fluctuation. Historically, there is a stable 1 percentage point gap between ECI and core PCE inflation, meaning to achieve the 2% core inflation target, ECI growth must fall to 3% y/y. While this implicit assumption of just 1% productivity growth seems low, it reflects a long-established statistical relationship between two macro datasets.

The market is generally hoping that AI-driven productivity gains will create leeway for higher wage growth. However, so far, this gap has not widened, warning investors not to bet on AI-driven productivity surges as a base case scenario.

The deep reason for structurally higher wage inflation is the persistent change in the composition of the labor force. Compared to pre-pandemic, the U.S. labor supply has shrunk by nearly 3 million older workers. Because different age groups are functionally complementary in the labor market—older workers cannot do labor-intensive jobs and younger workers cannot replace specialized roles requiring decades of experience—the absence of older workers creates an extra structural tension beyond the general job gap. Models show that factoring in this structural element almost perfectly explains the evolution of U.S. wage inflation.

Stocks Better Than Bonds

Faced with dual risks of contraction on both labor supply and demand, the Fed may choose to tolerate structurally elevated wage inflation, raising the inflation target range to 2.5% to 3.5%. This shift in policy stance will trigger a chain reaction among major asset classes.

First, short-term real interest rates could fall further. Even if inflation stays in the higher 2.5%-3.5% range, the Fed may keep cutting rates to support growth. Second, the dollar will remain under pressure as real rate differentials shrink, entering a weak channel. U.S. Treasuries face “bear steepening” risk: as inflation expectations rise, long yields trend upward, causing long-term Treasuries to underperform cash and other major sovereign bonds. In this macro climate, equities are likely to continue leading fixed-income products.

Based on these views, BCA Research offers new tactical trading advice: overweight the MSCI Global Consumer Discretionary sector versus Industrials. Data shows that over the past 65 trading days, Consumer Discretionary has underperformed Industrials by nearly 20%, with this almost-vertical drop now excessive in both magnitude and speed.

Market sentiment may be heading for a recovery window. Given the ultra-low real rate environment, possible fiscal stimulus, and a still resilient labor market, pricing of U.S. consumers may return to optimism.

Risk warning and disclaimerThe market carries risk, and investments should be made with caution. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and does not take into account individual users' specific investment objectives, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, views, or conclusions herein fit their particular circumstances. Invest at your own risk.